《鬼入侵》是雪莉·杰克逊同名经典小说的现代改编版,讲述了在美国最有名的鬼屋中长大的五个兄弟姐妹的故事。成年后,他们因为最小的妹妹的自杀而重新聚到一起,迫使他们最终面对与自身过往有关的鬼魂,一些潜伏在他们的心中,还有一些潜伏在这幢著名的山之屋(Hill House)的阴暗处。
《比利小子》讲述现实人物 - 法外之徒「比利小子/Henry McCarty」在美国当牛仔兼枪手,卷入林肯郡战争的故事。
荣获奥斯卡金像奖提名的导演理查德·林克莱特执导的这部光鲜亮丽的新黑色影片由格伦·鲍威尔主演。他在片中饰演刻板的教授加里·约翰逊—新奥尔良警察局的一名兼职假杀手。加里有着异乎寻常的天赋,擅长伪装成不同的人,来抓捕那些希望击退敌人的倒霉蛋。当他被一个潜在罪犯吸引时,他陷入了道德困境:这个罪犯是一个名叫麦迪逊(阿德里娅·阿霍纳饰)的美丽年轻女子。当麦迪逊爱上加里扮演的杀手角色之一(神秘性感的罗恩)时,他们的暧昧关系引发了一系列的连锁反应,包括演戏、欺骗和不断升级的赌注。《HitMan》由林克莱特和鲍威尔共同创作,改编自一个令人难以置信的真实故事,是一部巧妙描写身份的存在主义喜剧。
精英士兵费罗兹和拉凯什将踏上环球之旅, 追回被野心勃勃的复仇科学家卡比尔窃取的武器。对方企图利用人工智能摧毁印度
该剧基于休·豪伊所著同名畅销科幻系列小说改编,设定在被破坏、有毒的未来,数百层楼深的一个巨大地下筒仓中存在一个 社区,男人和女人生活在一个充满规章制度的社会里,凡是和“出去”有关的一切都成为致命禁忌。
ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.
讲述26岁的折村花子(松冈茉优饰),在儿时梦想·电影导演出道前,被卑劣的制片人欺骗而被夺走了企划。处于失意状态的花子,以完全看不懂气氛的男子·馆正夫(窪田正孝饰)的鼓励为契机,将10年以上音信不通的父亲(佐藤浩市饰)和两个哥哥(池松壮亮·若叶龙也饰)卷入其中,开始反击不讲理的社会。
一个时尚编辑和一个模特儿到另一座城市出差,两人各自发生艳遇,但春梦一觉醒来,才得见内心的惶恐。上世纪50年代的伯格曼作品经常有强迫深刻的意味,如本片对女性梦想、痛苦、挣扎等跟男人的关系作了探讨,虽然是部讽刺喜剧,但有一种焦距不准的模糊。
影片根据雅努什·柯扎克(JanuszKorczak)真实经历改编。1939年9月,德军占领华沙后,柯扎克拒绝了德国人的邀请,利用教授和医生的身份,在华沙建立了犹太孤儿院,并使这些孩子接受教育……1942年,随着对犹太人迫害的加剧,柯扎克四处筹集资金养活200个犹太孤儿,并与抵抗组织人员接触,但很快他们遭到盖世太保逮捕。柯扎克拒绝了德国走狗为他弄到的瑞士护照,决意与孩子们在一起,最终他与孩子们一起死在了特雷布林卡毒气室……影片力图把柯扎克塑造成视死如归的基督式人物,描述他把正义和尊严放到比安全和生命更重要的位置。影片结尾处孩子们在乡野自由漫跑的镜头属于美好祝愿,导演也许因为觉得若拍摄他们进入毒气室太残忍了吧。
故事发生在位于密西西比的劳改农场之中,杀人犯鲍尔斯(基思·卡拉丹KeithCarradine饰)伙同他在狱中结识的一干亡命之徒实施越狱,幸运之神眷顾了他们,成功越狱后的鲍尔斯一行人来到了亲戚家,打算躲躲风头。在那里,鲍尔斯遇见了名为剀切(谢莉·杜瓦尔ShelleyDuvall饰)的女子,剀切的温柔善良令鲍尔斯一见钟情,可是,如今沦为逃犯的鲍尔斯真的能够如他所愿抱得美人归吗?越狱之后,鲍尔斯和他的兄弟们不甘寂寞,抢了几次小劫,“收成”尚且说得过去,这令几个大男人放松了警惕。终于,在又一次抢劫之中,劫匪们遭遇了“滑铁卢”,躲避着穷追不舍的警察,鲍尔斯来到了剀切处,希望她能够提供庇护。