Paulinefollowstheeponymousprotagonist,an18-year-oldwhoaccidentallybecomespregnant–fromaone-nightstand.Withschoolstress,theclimatecrisisandthedownfallofsocietyweighingheavilyonhermind,somethingshedoesn’tneedatallrightnowiscatchingfeelings,especiallynotforherone-nightstandLukas,who,asitturnsout,isthedevilhimself.

资深病毒学家安雅·马尔科娃放弃了在莫斯科的个人和职业生活，搬到新西伯利亚的病毒学中心工作。她显然是在试图逃避某种个人的痛苦，但命运在新地方给了她另一个考验 - 因附近一个大型肉联厂非法倾倒行为，导致一种未知病毒的爆发。为了弥补过去的错误，安雅决定亲自调查这个村庄。然而，当地居民不信任现代治疗方法，也没有意识到危险，对病毒学家充满敌意。村庄中，一场新型疫情开始蔓延…

讲述一个年轻兽医给乡间小动物们治病过程中发生的那些美好温情的故事。

暂无简介

《鬼入侵》是雪莉·杰克逊同名经典小说的现代改编版，讲述了在美国最有名的鬼屋中长大的五个兄弟姐妹的故事。成年后，他们因为最小的妹妹的自杀而重新聚到一起，迫使他们最终面对与自身过往有关的鬼魂，一些潜伏在他们的心中，还有一些潜伏在这幢著名的山之屋（Hill House）的阴暗处。

荣获奥斯卡金像奖提名的导演理查德·林克莱特执导的这部光鲜亮丽的新黑色影片由格伦·鲍威尔主演。他在片中饰演刻板的教授加里·约翰逊—新奥尔良警察局的一名兼职假杀手。加里有着异乎寻常的天赋，擅长伪装成不同的人，来抓捕那些希望击退敌人的倒霉蛋。当他被一个潜在罪犯吸引时，他陷入了道德困境：这个罪犯是一个名叫麦迪逊（阿德里娅·阿霍纳饰）的美丽年轻女子。当麦迪逊爱上加里扮演的杀手角色之一（神秘性感的罗恩）时，他们的暧昧关系引发了一系列的连锁反应，包括演戏、欺骗和不断升级的赌注。《HitMan》由林克莱特和鲍威尔共同创作，改编自一个令人难以置信的真实故事，是一部巧妙描写身份的存在主义喜剧。

精英士兵费罗兹和拉凯什将踏上环球之旅， 追回被野心勃勃的复仇科学家卡比尔窃取的武器。对方企图利用人工智能摧毁印度

该剧基于休·豪伊所著同名畅销科幻系列小说改编，设定在被破坏、有毒的未来，数百层楼深的一个巨大地下筒仓中存在一个 社区，男人和女人生活在一个充满规章制度的社会里，凡是和“出去”有关的一切都成为致命禁忌。

ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.

一个时尚编辑和一个模特儿到另一座城市出差，两人各自发生艳遇，但春梦一觉醒来，才得见内心的惶恐。上世纪50年代的伯格曼作品经常有强迫深刻的意味，如本片对女性梦想、痛苦、挣扎等跟男人的关系作了探讨，虽然是部讽刺喜剧，但有一种焦距不准的模糊。